![]() Inn Between brought this action to revoke its acceptance of the computer system because the computer system failed to operate properly. Despite the fact that Remanco repeatedly responded to the problems with the computer system and repaired the computer system on numerous occasions, the computer system nevertheless constantly broke down. Malfunctions with the computer system continued so that during the period from Mato July 3, 1995, Inn Between notified Remanco on 48 occasions that it was having problems with the computer system. On March 30, 1995, the computer system malfunctioned and was down for three hours during a training session conducted by Remanco. The computer system was delivered and installed by Remanco on March 29, 1995. The buyer relied upon the seller’s expertise to select a proper computer system for the use intended. In addition, the parties entered into a maintenance contract, whereby Remanco agreed to keep the computer system in good operating order. ![]() ![]() On February 1, 1995, plaintiff, The Inn Between, Inc., hereinafter Inn Between, of Syosset, New York, entered into a contract to purchase a used, refurbished and rebuilt restaurant computer system, including installation and training, from defendant Remanco Metropolitan, Inc., hereinafter Remanco, of North Caldwell, New Jersey. Defendant computer seller had sufficient unsuccessful "bytes at the apple” to repair a restaurant computer system, so as to *68justify the buyer’s revocation of its acceptance of the failed computer system under UCC 2-608.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |